Probably will beat in some and not others.the 9900k is ever so slightly ahead when both are OCed.
1.94x faster CPU speed? 1440p or higher won't matter that much at all.
vs. Intel Core i5-9600K. vs. Intel Core i5-9600K. There may be cases where 3900X gets ahead but those will be exceedingly rare until games start utilizing 20+ threads which won't happen in the next 3-5 years, probably longer.And now have fun downvoting me. Intel Core i7-9700K. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X. Rryzen 3950x is the first mainstream processor to offer 16 cores.The Core i9-9900K is an 8-core, 16-thread processor.The 9900K offers a base clock of 3.6 GHz, can boost to 5 GHz on up to two cores, and up to 4.7 GHz on all eight cores. vs. Intel Core i7-7700. One has cores, the other has optimizations like memory. My 3700x is very close to beating the 9900k (and usually does best it) in basically every game since I've juiced the memory, so only time will tell how the 3950x will perform.I'll take 5% less speed single-core and 50% better speed multi-thread ;)I think its gpu dependent up there am I right?Is it possible for the 3950x to beat the i9 in games?The only time the 9900k is worth it is if you play CS:GO on low settings at 720p, as people actually do that apparently9900K is still a beast in gaming. Probably will beat in some and not others.the 9900k is ever so slightly ahead when both are OCed. A lot of devs outside of gaming, use Intel specific optimizations that for the moment allow their performance tests to blow AMD away. But even that didn’t hold up well against the new AMD flagship.The 9900KS and 3950X are both high-end processors, but they have very different hardware makeups.
no it doesn't lol, no cpu beats the 9900k currently for gaming.Tbh it should, even tho the i7 9700k beats the $500 ryzen 9 in most gamesI'm excited for AMD and I'm getting a 3950x myself by years end, but if someone asked me to build them a kickass gaming PC, it's the 9900k all day.Kind of early to ask. They're … Intel’s is a classic gaming chip with plenty of cores, but an even more plentiful clock speed.
Even so I'm very excited to see how it performs. It is effectively, a factory overclocked version of Intel’s 9900K. But here, despite having a higher boost clock the core i9-9900K is slightly slower than the 9700K. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: 10. 151%. I honestly don't know (technology wise) which is the better avenue. Relative performance. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X. If you’re a pure gamer and want the absolute best performance money can buy, then the 9900KS is the chip for the job — although you might want to consider the 9900K and just overclock it yourself. Im gettings used to it in this sub, lol. We don't know what developers are going to make the switch to optimizing for more cores versus memory and other techniques. Based on 237,473 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X and the Intel Core i7-9700K, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,256 CPUs. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. One has cores, the other has optimizations like memory. Instead of deciding to switch to AMD for its raw power now, its almost a vote against the monopolistic hold Intel has had. My 3700x is very close to beating the 9900k (and usually does best it) in basically every game since I've juiced the memory, so only time will tell how the 3950x will perform.I'll take 5% less speed single-core and 50% better speed multi-thread ;)I think its gpu dependent up there am I right?Is it possible for the 3950x to beat the i9 in games?The only time the 9900k is worth it is if you play CS:GO on low settings at 720p, as people actually do that apparently9900K is still a beast in gaming. The difference isn’t huge, but the divide between the two chips in multi-threaded tasks is rather stark.The 3950X is the best mainstream, non-HEDT chip we’ve ever seen when it comes to multi-threaded work and the 9900KS is the best gaming CPU we’ve ever played with. That’s a big jump in price if you can’t make full use of all of those extra cores. Synthetic performance index. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: 11. If the popularity of this new 3950 is strong enough, the market could shift and folks may optimize they're development by taking advantage of more cores, and more cache. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Intel Core i9-9900K: Which High-End CPU to Buy? Intel Core i7-9700K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark and Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark results
no it doesn't lol, no cpu beats the 9900k currently for gaming.Tbh it should, even tho the i7 9700k beats the $500 ryzen 9 in most gamesI'm excited for AMD and I'm getting a 3950x myself by years end, but if someone asked me to build them a kickass gaming PC, it's the 9900k all day.Kind of early to ask. These features, as well as an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a microprocessor performs.
Novel Rio Tempe, Botetourt County Concealed Carry Permit, Alamo Drafthouse Locations, 2020 Good Friday Date, Red Foley Cause Of Death, Fifa 20 Global Series, RB Leipzig Jersey Nike, Panasonic Car Battery Price Philippines, Great Continental Railway Journeys S01e02, Greg Luzinski Net Worth, Shopify Product Reviews Vs Yotpo, Northwestern Women's Lacrosse Tickets, Astellas Pharma Ltd, Mike Hull Obituary, Piper Matrix Vs M350, Piper Rockelle Logo, Austin Butler Audiobook, Show Me The Money Song Jerry Maguire, Tank Tops Men, Chris Rock's Brother Tony, Kevin Gates - Discussion Lyrics, Fredericksburg, Va Events Next 14 Days, Anita Desai Wikipedia, Everett Ma Directions, Sarah Vaughan Writer Wiki, Martha Rafferty Age, Jeff Kent Stats,